Monday, October 9, 2023

WHY ISRAEL?

When I was seventeen years young, I was working a game at Kennywood Amusement Park in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It was one of those games where you tossed pennies or dimes and tried to get the coin to cover any of the multiple bullseyes on a wood platform. A boy, who couldn’t have been older than twelve cracked a few Jewish jokes, none of which were original considering small coins were being tossed, but sensing the crowd’s indifference, he said rather directly, “I hope no one here is Jewish.

I responded with, “I am Jewish.”

To which he looked at me as if we were discussing the Pirates and said, “Oh, well no offense. I just hate Jews.”

There’s a classic antisemitic question asked of Jews in America: ‘Are you an American Jew or are you a Jewish American?’ It is not so much a question as it is a test to cast aspersions on your loyalty. Do you choose America first or do you choose being a Jew first (and choose Israel) and betray your country. This question found its way to me once when I was attending a Catholic High School (that’s a different story for another time). A fellow student posed the question that if America and Israel got into a war, which army would I join? There is no right answer of course. If you respond with America, they cough up the reply, America? What kind of a Jew are you to turn your back on your own kind? And if you choose Israel, we already know what response that musters. 

But there is often confusion among the gentile population as to why Jews still care so much about Israel when they are so safe in America? Especially if they have never taken the time to visit. The answer is quite simple.

In 1939 a boat named the MS St. Louis carrying over 900 Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany attempted to seek refuge in the United States. They were denied and sent back to Europe where the majority experienced their systematic death at the hands of the Third Reich. Americans will shake their heads and claim that we didn’t know what was happening fully or it was a mistake nobody could have understood the implications of back then.

Except that when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a chance to bomb the rail lines that provided transport to the concentration camps, he chose to save munitions despite the fact the American Industrial Complex was full steam ahead in manufacturing our war effort in Europe. Some Americans will say well which would you rather have, Berlin bombed or the rail lines, as if it had to be one or the other? As if Berlin’s downfall wasn’t at that point a future certainty.


The MS St. Louis in New York Harbor

I’ve heard reassurances all the time from non-Jewish friends that these kinds of things could never happen in America, that we have changed.

I say turn your heads and peer toward our southern border crisis and the radical cries of indignance and indifference Americans have offered to those seeking refuge here again. Those refugees too, are going to be sent back to places where they felt so threatened that without any means or transport, they made their way to America on hope alone. I ask you, should there be anybody more empathetic to the cries of these refugees than a Jew?

The difference now is that should I find myself a person that America no longer wants, and America has had a funny way of choosing when it does or doesn’t want people, there is a place I am lucky enough to be accepted because I was born. If I wanted, they would resettle me there right now and be happier for it.

After the events of this past weekend, my heart aches in a way it hasn’t in a long time. For family. For friends. For people I don’t know yet share that common bond of simply being born a Jew and being hated for it. For acquaintances I knew as children who are now in their thirties and likely going to war for the first time. For a country that has truly never known peace in its almost 65 years of existence despite its charter wishing to make peace with anyone offering it. For a country who despite its youth has seen as many wars and conflicts as any other modern country in history against countries and against bands of radical militias calling for one thing and one thing only: the death of more Jews. Two hundred and sixty people, the majority between the ages of 18 to 25, were slaughtered in cold blood at a music festival Saturday. Imagine what happened in Las Vegas happening again but with almost no survivors. There were old women and children kidnapped on video being tortured by people claiming they are fighting for freedom.

Just what kind of freedom are they fighting for? 

An Israeli mother and her two boys at gunpoint Saturday

When the Hutus were slaughtering the Tutsi in Rwanda, the outcries were clear that something had to be done to stop the violence. When the genocide took place over in Bosnia against the Bosnian Muslims, there were outcries for it to stop. Even President Bill Clinton, against the advice of his detractors, attempted to bomb Bosnia-Herzegovina as a way of doing something. Yet we know what the international community in Europe, and particularly in Asia, will say the moment Israel decides to respond with the mighty force such slaughter demands. Whether they want to recognize Israel as a sovereign nation is irrelevant. Israel exists. It is a nation and has been so since 1948, and to deny their people and government a means to put an end to an intransigent government faction on its eastern border, one which has gone far beyond disobeying international laws with non-stop missile barrages and barbarous attacks on civilians living near that border, is to practice the type of hypocrisy one can find only in current despotic and communist regimes.

And why is that? 

Is it because Israel is so important to them? Or is it because the idea of Jewish State makes them sick to their stomachs due to the clarification that it is ‘Jewish.' Perhaps that feels elitist to them or they feel left out, jealous, envious, or worse… angered to see the continuation of a people they cannot understand and secretly despise.

Why, Israel, you ask? 

I have watched and listened to Americans, many of them my friends, stand up and support a populist in this country who has uttered such rhetoric as killing of the Joints Chief of Staff. I have heard them all say when the election was decided, if he lost, he would step down and allow the transfer of power peacefully. And even despite seeing the video that shows the carnage in our schools, in our churches and sanctuaries and on January 6, 2021, they insist America is safe. 

Don’t tell me we are safe. The only place where there is guaranteed safety for a Jew is under assault right now. She is being attacked from the North and from the East, by proxies of a larger country to their North whose cowardly designs on world order is to wreak havoc on those who don’t heed their Ayatollahs.

Why Israel, you ask?

That is why.

And whether you believe it or not, an attack of this sort on Israel is an attack on all free peoples.  May Israel find herself shrouded in a canopy of protection, her people returned home to their families, and may peace find a stranglehold on this situation once and for all.

 I leave you with Martin NeimÓ§ller’s famous lines written just after the Holocaust:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist. 
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. 
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. 
Then they came for me
                        —and there was no one left to speak for me.

Thursday, September 28, 2023

WHY THE NFL PRE-SEASON IS KILLING WHAT YOU THINK YOU KNOW


The NFL season is barely three weeks old, but the volumes of predictions, expectations and analysis that populated the web since May is infinite.

Most good analysts will tell you who they think the good teams are and more often than not, be correct. In the NFC, the Philadelphia Eagles and San Francisco 49ers were the odds on favorites to meet in the NFC Championship game from the outset. The AFC was more complicated but the default choices of the Kansas City Chiefs meeting one of the Cincinnati Bengals or Buffalo Bills seemed likely.

However, every analyst also wants to take a shot at someone unexpected.

Chris Broussard predicted the Bengals and Ravens would be the tops of the AFC with the Ravens winning. In the NFC, he predicted the Eagles vs. the 49ers with the Eagles emerging victorious.

Eric Mangini predicted KC as tops in the AFC over the Bengals but preferred the the 49ers in the NFC.

Nick Wright predicted KC over Jacksonville in the AFC. However, while he saw the NFC on paper as still being Eagles and Niners, he predicted Dallas vs. Seattle in the NFC Championship, with the Chiefs topping out over the Cowboys.

Sephen A. Smith believes the Eagles will reign supreme when it all plays out;

And Keyshawn Johnson threw perhaps the riskiest Super Bowl fortune :New Orleans defeating Baltimore.


Regardless of what we all thought we knew about this NFL season going in, it's as if we're existing in a multiverse, where bizarre losses, substandard calls, and crazy turnovers show up at crucial moments.

Week 1 saw Kansas City drop their home opener against an upstart Detroit team. The Steelers got destroyed at home by the now undefeated 49ers, and the Giants were owned 40-0 by the Dallas Cowboys. Then the Jets held on to upset Buffalo on Monday night despite losing their franchise in Aaron Rodgers.

Week 2 showed us a little more normalcy based on the preseason speculation, but then Week 3 occurred. Baltimore dropped a game at home to a Gardner-Minshew-led Colts team. Arizona beat up the Cowboys on the ground. With Derek Carr knocked out, New Orleans' offense became anorexic and lost to Green Bay after leading 17-0 at the start of the 4th quarter. Most surprising perhaps, the Houston Texans under the helm of rookie C.J, Stroud put up 37 points against division rival Jacksonville at TIAA Bank Field.

It’s only a matter of time before experts blame Lamar Jackson or Daniel Jones’ lackluster QBR on their big contracts. The old trope of the Chargers and the Bengals are franchises that can’t get out of their own is bound to rear its head.  

Are players just taking weeks off like the NBA players do? Or is it more complicated than that. While there are always a few teams which are underrated by the pundits, things are not so erratic, at least not from teams so decidedly predicted to win. Where did the Bengals go? How about the Jags, last year's AFC South winner. Did anyone forecast that Sean Peyton's new toy in Denver would ever give up ten touchdowns in the first three games, let alone one week?

Though it may feel like the NFL has shifted into the world of the Matrix, there are some legitimate reasons why these things might be happening. Take the Blue pill and come back to the real world.

1) NFL teams now play 17 games. That one extra game is important in terms of player preservation.

2)    Most teams don't play their starters (particularly their quarterbacks) but for maybe a few quarters in the preseason.

3) The QBs for the upset winners in Week 3 all played a ton of this preseason 

4) The QBs for Dallas, Baltimore and Jacksonville did not.

5) While the elite teams in both conferences appeared obvious on paper (the Eagles and Niners in the NFC, the Bills, Bengals and Chiefs in the AFC), teams like the Falcons, Commanders, Lions, Packers, Browns, Colts, Steelers and Dolphins were not easily defined. We believe some if not all of these teams will be improved, but there are big question marks that will determine the outcomes.

To address these one by one - Adding a seventeenth game is a big deal. It means starting 0-3 might not be a playoff death sentence. The Vikings aren't out of it....yet. 

Combined preseason snaps for Allen/Herbert = zero

With a shorter preseason, most of the starters are not playing anymore.  Like not at all.  Patrick Mahomes took 26 snaps this preseason. Justin Herbert, Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen all took zero. Trevor Lawrence threw 16 passes. The one QB who spits in the face of this analysis is Tua Tagovailoa who played 14 series spread over two games and he's been nothing short of amazing thus far, though his offense is basically unchanged from last year.

While on paper we can look at a team and make some pretty decent assumptions, execution in football comes down to repetition.  Depending on how many rookies your franchise is starting, the more in-game scenarios these guys face, the more prepared they’ll be. As Jimmy Garoppolo said of his new WR Davante Adams, and I paraphrase, ‘I had to take a whole course in Davante.’  

We need to consider the first two weeks of NFL Football as the pre-season now for most starting quarterbacks, if not most teams.

Thinking of those games this way explains the timing issues you've seen between quarterback and receiver. There have been multiple plays with blown coverages and missed assignments. Kenny Pickett threw Marcus Peters a pick-six (to a receiver that ran the wrong route) that was so gift-wrapped Peters dropped it. Those kind of miscues often determine the outcome of games.

Because of this, suppositions based on the first two weeks are precarious. Is the Dallas defense the same group that shutout the Giants in Week 1, or was Daniel Jones and his unsteady receiving corps just off? Because Dallas’s defense just got manhandled at by the Cardinals to the tune of 7.2 yards per carry with career backup Josh Dobbs at quarterback, but a backup who did play the entire preseason. Where did Trevor Lawrence go and that Jaguars defense go?  Or is Houston developing under C. J. Stroud’s new leadership?  

For the NFL, familiarity breeds execution. In my estimation, what we’re seeing is the adjustment by many teams to new personnel, new coaching schemes and some overall rust.  Week 4 should begin to reveal some consistency, and barring major injuries like the one to Browns RB Nick Chubb, better teams should begin to figure things out.  

Saturday, February 25, 2023

JUST GOT REAL




Trivialities made cataclysmic,
I say with a smile
and those around me frown.
Today's late doctor, or missed coffee run
will mean nothing when
the shit comes down.

Hoisting your problems higher
than the love you could feel;
tomorrow you might look in the mirror
and realize, oh man,
shit just got real.

Watch the news
angered by an anchor's view
that isn't news relay.
Anger is rising
post a meme and miss out on  
the gorgeous vibrant day.

With birds singing,
dogs barking, 
all your sense array
Heaven is alive right here
on earth, but Facebook calls
TikTok has your attention today.


He says its the end 
and points the blame imposing fears on top of rage, not realizing their world of drama and fear becomes a daunting cage, without escape, it's why we turn to a caped crusader to save the day, caught up in the din of media's outstretched arm. 

Just push it away.

Creating giant problems over
love that's present and real;
tomorrow you might look in the mirror
and realize, oh man,
shit just got real.

Watch the news, 
angry it doesn't speak to you
take up arms and fear your neighbor
like you do.
Find a leader who will solve all woes
and realize he's one of you.
Attack the Capitol like he told you to do.


Trivialities are now cataclysmic,
I say in a darkening mood,
as those around me drown.
Today's lost job, or missed appointment
will mean nothing now that
the shit came down.

Hoisting your problems higher
there's only bitterness left
to feel;
today, you look in the mirror
and realize, oh man,
shit just got real.

Thursday, September 29, 2022

IT’S A NO-WIN SITUATION FOR MITCH TRUBISKY

Like him or hate, Mitch Trubisky has got giant, elephant-sized balls.



Why?

Because coming to a storied franchise like the Steelers with a number one draft pick marinating behind him is like investing in a company very short-term. How short-term? Well consider the following:

According to SB Nation’s Behind the Steel Curtain Steelers Stat Geek podcast, the Steelers offensive line is improving. Of the five sacks the Steelers have relinquished this year, the Steelers offensive line is credited with allowing zero. Read that again, zero.

The Steelers blocking scheme allowed all runners not named Najee Harris to enjoy a 6.0 yard-per-carry against the Browns.

When Mitch Trubisky uses play-action, he is 15-of-17 for a completion rate of over 85 percent and has a 10+ yards per attempt average. Without it, he’s 47-86 for a 4.5 YPA.

According to profootballreference.com, Trubisky has ten completions on eleven pass attempts in play-action for 112 yards which means he’s averaging over 11 years per completion (they might not yet have added this previous Thursday's stats yet).

These might be small sample sizes sure, but can you ignore the fact the longer Mitch has to throw the ball, the more accurate he is?  

Yet, where is most of the blame going for the Steelers anemic offense? Mitch Trubisky.

Why?

Because the Steelers have a long history of winning and when winning doesn’t come the Steelers’ way, they almost always blame the quarterback. There are others like me, who thought the offensive line was still, well, offensive. However, the numbers don’t lie.

In an age where these kinds of statistics are available, one has to be sickened by the fact it’s clear that Steelers (specifically Matt Canada and his staff) are trying to turn Mitch Trubisky into Ben Roethlisberger rather than looking at how good he can be using his strengths to the tune of a 1-2 start.

It’s becoming clearer that the reason Najee Harris’ runs looks so pedestrian is because he is so, well, pedestrian. He’s uninventive, indecisive and is credited for a missed assignment leading to one of the five sacks on Trubisky. Harris is looking like a bust, regardless if he eclipsed 1,000 yards in his rookie season. Any running back given 300 carries is going to come close to that and Harris had 307 for 1200 rushing yards, second most in the league, with his longest run being twenty-five yards. (The leader was Jonathan Taylor with only 25 more carries yet 600 more yards!). This year, Harris yards -per-attempt has dropped from 3.9 to 3.2, yet all metrics point to having a better offensive line in front of him. I know he’s had a Lisfranc foot injury, and those injuries can nag. But if that’s part of the problem, sit out and  get healthy and then show us something!

With Kenny Pickett in the wings, and Matt Canada calling plays for an entirely different offense than the one he has, Mitch Trubisky’s gamble might destroy his career for good. It’s time to point the blame where it belongs: Matt Canada, because there’s no guarantee that even a scrambling, young quarterback like Pickett can thrive in this mundane and dysfunctional offense which any decent analyst could correct for better efficiency.

The Steelers are not 1-2 because of Mitch Trubisky or their offensive line. They’re 1-2 because of the inability of their offensive coordinator to pay attention to who is on his team, analyze their strengths and weaknesses and apply them properly So, how short term of an investment you say? Sadly, Mitch Trubisky has probably got a few more weeks until his career becomes one of permanent backup status.

And he deserves better.




Friday, September 3, 2021

CHILDREN SHOULD RESPECT THEIR ELDERS

 CHILDREN SHOULD RESPECT THEIR ELDERS!

I’m a parent of two.  I’m not a psychologist.  However, by default, the job of parent is made up of many different fields.  I am part psychologist, amateur of course.  I’m part doctor.  I’m part educator.  I’m part healer.  And I’m part guidance counselor.

One of the toughest things for me about being a parent is watching other parents, as I’m sure it is for you too.  We all have pre-ordained thoughts handed down from the generations before us as to what a model parent looks like.  In the natural order of things, a good parent to me looks like my parents.  That’s the default.  I think I turned out all right.  So, they must have done something right.  

Most of us turn out all right.  Not everyone turns out ok.  And by that, I mean there is a difference between being functionally able to hold a job and earn income, buy a house and a car, get married, have pets and kids.  That is being all right.  But most of us are not OK.  By OK, I mean satisfied with how things have gone in our lives and how positive we look at the future.  I often feel unvalued, disrespected, and challenged emotionally to keep it all together day in and day out.  It’s probably one of the reasons I write.

When I trace back the little things in my life that didn’t go how I might have wanted them, there are a plethora of reasons.  Yet, one of the major ones is something I had no control over, and that’s who my parents were.   None of us have that choice.  It’s the luck of the draw.  Some of us start life off winning the lottery, and I don’t mean you’re born into a rich family.  Rich does not equal healthy, as I think we all know.

One of the aphorisms that seems to unify all parents is that children should have respect for their elders.  It’s how our parents were brought up, and so naturally, we expect our children to be no different.  I think we can all agree this is a good idea.  Ah, but there is that awful word--- SHOULD

The word SHOULD is a terrible word if you think about it.  The word should is loaded with implications of universal knowledge; that there is some unified way of thinking everyone abides by.  In the case of our elders, children SHOULD respect them.  But what is an elder?  Well, firstly, someone older than you, right?  Your sister is the eldest child, meaning the oldest.  But the word elder means more than just having age on your side.  One of the synonyms of elder is ‘leader’.  To be a leader simply doesn’t mean being older.  It suggests a level of wisdom, or learnedness.

So back to the original issue.  Our children SHOULD respect their elders.  Then why is it so many elders don’t understand that children aren’t born with a sense of respect?  In fact, children aren’t born with much of anything – simply a mechanism to alert us they need food, warmth, sleep, and we all know what this is– crying.  They cry.  Then there is the genetic information they get such as eye color, hair color, skin tone, how quickly they learn, and hopefully, their health.

If an elder expects to be treated with respect, then it would seem to be logical the elder enacts such guidelines throughout his/her community that reflect that moral.  Ethics and morals need to be taught, not assumed.  And it is my experience that so many parents I overhear simply expect their child to listen without questioning, trust without hesitating, and love unconditionally without the parent having to do the same.  

How is that possible?  Would you expect as an English major to get a first job at NASA and be put in mission control just because you saw rockets launch on television?  Because expecting a baby to learn right and wrong, respect and love, just because you’re their parent and you are the adult assumes an order to things that isn’t so easy for a child to comprehend.  Because the first things we begin to teach a child the moment he/she begins to eat is to eat on their own.  When they walk, we help train them to walk on their own- to be individual, and by such teaching give them a sense of their own innate value.  Then, the moment they can start expressing their opinions, what do we want them to do?  Shut up.

Children have limited ways to express their needs

I, as a parent, have gone through multiple growth spurts.  All of them difficult, all of them eye-opening.  The first realization I had and continue to be reminded of, is that children don’t respect their elders because they don’t know respect is unless I TEACH IT TO THEM.  I had to teach them to say please and thank you.  I had to teach them how to share.  I had to teach them how to be humble.  I had to teach them tact – the idea that you may get a gift on your birthday you already have, so you say thank you, realizing that if you didn’t have it, it would have been a perfect gift, and make the givers feel good about being so thoughtful.   I had to teach them that when not in our care their teacher is the person in charge of them through me, and I expect them to be kind and courteous to that person as if they were me.  

I have also came to the realization that when my children are going to be at their worst (just like I have bad days, too) I would prefer they do it in front of me.  That means I need to expect the tantrums, the nastiness, the backtalk, the contrariness, the throwing of things, slamming of doors and everything – as part of what it is for them to be the child. 

My emotional systems are set up in a much more advanced stage then theirs.  How on earth am I going to expect them to grow out of their tantrums and door slamming if I do the same when my wife and I have a disagreement?  How on earth do I expect my child not to hit other children if the response I have to my child committing a wrong is to hit my child?  How can I expect my child to speak with respect if my wife and I degrade each other in front of them or I talk down to other people around them?

These things are in complete disagreement with one another.  They do not work together.  I SHOULD BE BETTER, no?  And there is that word again SHOULD.  Should is a word that needs to be removed from the English language except when expressing our wishes.  Should isn’t a word that ever helps an argument.  Should is a word that is kind of dangerous.

I am not always better, but I can try to be.  I can try to remember that as brilliant a lexicon as my son has, he is still only 9.  That as promising an artist at my six-year-old appears to be, he is just that, 6.  They are looking to my wife and me to be the best we can be, and when we aren’t, to show them how it’s done when we fail.  Apologize, hug, kiss, hold hands and speak to each other with respect in front of them as well.

When my wife and I fight, and the children witness it we try to make sure they see how we repair things.   And if we can’t do that, then we show them we are hugging again, that what they witnessed was part of a healthy relationship.  They must be taught how to make-up as well.  

Children should respect their elders, no doubt.  But first, their elders should respect the age differential in their children by being their golden knight- protecting them from things they can’t see and handle at different ages – violence for example.  I sat next to a 6-year-old on one of the opening nights of Jurassic Park – a 10pm screening --- and all I thought was 'are these parents being the protective wall for this child?' Are they prepared for the consequences of not only keeping their child up late and possibly disturbing his routine, but of the nightmares and the processing that will go on in his mind when he witnesses a death on-screen?  Does this child understand acting?  Special effects?  

It gets worse than this I’m afraid. I know someone that trained their six-year-old to fire a gun and gun safety.  When I boldly proffered a slight objection, the parent assured me their child knew what kind of ass-whooping he/she would get if she ever handled the gun when they weren’t home.  To which I replied, yeah right because you know, children always listen to their parents.  That ass-whooping is quite the deterrent.  It sure stopped me from showing everyone who would look my dad’s rifle in its hiding place downstairs in our basement behind his workbench.  As an elder, ask the question whether you sincerely believe your child is old enough to comprehend the cause and effect of a gun and what it can do?

If we allow our children to seek out their screens as a coping mechanism or seek out our screens during our time with our children, just how as parents do we expect our kids to learn to connect to other human beings?

This scene look familiar?

I’m not preaching, mind you.  I’m asking the questions that I would ask of myself.  We, as parents, often forget that what we take for granted with age children have not yet procured in their youth.  It must be taught, and everyone’s learning curve is different.  To ask these questions every time we place a child in a situation not of their own making whether or not we are doing the work of responsible elder - won't that lead us in the direction we're hoping?  Won't that lead to our children respecting us?

In all things that are our society today, the one thing that we can certainly change is how we parent our children. Whether we make them a top priority.  Whether we show them our fears and stresses and if we do, how we explain it to them. It's a battle we all face and one that is not easy.  

That’s what I leave you with.  I’m trying to be the best elder for my child.  I wish you the best of luck and hope you will too.





Thursday, April 8, 2021

WHAT DO WE STAND FOR?

 
There's an incredibly powerful scene in the second Batman installment, THE DARK KNIGHT, where the Joker has set two ferry boats out each loaded with an explosive device, and each boat has been presented a detonator to the other's bomb.  One is full of prisoners being transferred, the other has regular citizens. He offers each boat a choice - blow up the other boat first taking all those people with it, and your boat will survive.  If neither boat acts by midnight, both will be destroyed.


As Batman is facing off against The Joker, both of them wait for the strike of midnight.  Naturally, an argument ensues on each boat - the boat with the regular citizens proffer the idea that the prisoners deserve to die because they had their chance and failed.  They decide to vote on a course of action.  Meanwhile, aboard the prisoner's boat, the guards discuss what to do.  Are they willing to blow up the other boat?   


A prisoner steps forward and tells his chaperones they don't know how to take a life --  to hand over the detonator to him and he'll have the courage to do what they can't.  Simultaneously, because a decision has not been reached and they're running out of time, a gentleman citizen steps forward and volunteers to blow up the prisoner's boat.  

This scene is at the core of everything Batman and Joker stand for, and it's not coincidental that the two are face to face at this moment in the movie, the Joker leering over Batman, who he's pinned down.  The moral heart of each character is at stake, and if either of the ferry boats blow up, the Joker proves that Batman's gallant fight is all for naught.  It will rip the soul out of Batman and anyone who believes Gotham can be redeemed.  



But what happens?  The Prisoner, insisting his overseer give him the remote, granting his superior the excuse that he can say he was overpowered by the prisoners, takes the remote and promptly tosses it out the window, sealing their fate.  All of the guards' faces collectively sink in the realization they're all going to die. Ironically, the murderer, the thief, lowest of the low, the supposedly unredeemable still has the ability to understand life's value its most basic level. He is unwilling to take any life this way, even if it means sacrificing his own.


The citizen, initially certain he's able to turn the key, holds the remote in his hand and freezes.  He swallows hard and realizes that talking about doing something so destructive is one thing.  Actually doing it is another.  He cedes the remote back to the staff of the ship in shame and retakes his seat.  Both find themselves equally unwilling to kill, metaphorically equalizing the prisoner and civilian as equal creatures that are often situation dependent.

Batman and Joker await the outcome, and as midnight comes and goes without action, Joker is distraught.  Before he can blow up both boats, Batman is able to turn the tables on Joker, finding strength in society's reaffirmation of his fight.  Good still does exist.

This is essentially a fictional version of a more terrifying story that played out of a real life.  Not long ago, I heard a story that came from the son of an Auschwitz survivor.  His father recalled seeing a father and son get off the train at the camp, and a Nazi guard pulling them aside.  He told the boy to lay on the ground on his back and gave the father a shovel.  He told the father to place the edge of the shovel over the boy's neck and to step on it.  The father refused.  So the guard told the father to lie down on his back and offered the boy the same choice, to step on the shovel into his father's neck.  He refused.  The guard then summarily shot both of them dead.  

In the recent months since the Capitol Riot, I have found myself pondering this question over and over.  What do you stand for?  What would I sacrifice my life for?  Is there anything?  What would I immediately react to and not think for a second about myself or my future? 

The first answer was naturally my kids, my wife.... but is that where it ends?  What about innocent children, women, or men?  Where are our voices to be found in an age where things happen to other people on our television screens and many can't even acknowledge that it could very well have been one of us.

I once witnessed a car hit a bicycle as the vehicle entered an onramp to the 134 freeway.  It was very early morning so the roads were empty, and the bicyclist flew over the front end of the car, off the side and onto the cement.  The driver of the car stopped, got out, and stood frozen, looking at the fallen rider.  I made an immediate U-turn and pulled over to the curb.  I ran across the street to the gas station opposite the onramp and yelled for them to call 9-1-1.  Shockingly, the first response came from a worker inside the repair garage.  His reply was "You call 9-1-1."   This was before cell phones were common, and I may have told him to "F off and call 9-1-1, that we had a man down who had been hit by a car.  Another person at the station yelled he would make the call.  I ran to my car and grabbed my emergency blanket out of my trunk, and approached the rider.  He was lying on his front, and appeared possibly unconscious. I summoned every recollection I had from being a lifeguard a few years prior and did whatever first aid I could (calmed him, told him help was coming and he'd be ok, took his pulse, told him to stay still).  The driver never moved.  He was in shock.  I don't remember if he drove off or hung around.  

I don't tell this story to extol any virtues of my own, but I do think it speaks to how I react in critical situations. I didn't know the cyclist or the driver, yet my reaction was immediately to stop and help.

I've found myself asking this of cohorts who supported the Trump mandates, who allowed him to label the virus the "Kung Flu" or the "Chinese Virus" which is now linked to a 150% increase in hate crimes against Asians in America.  I have posted how vile this is, but what have I done about it?  I have asked myself if I saw a woman getting beaten up, like an elderly Asian woman was a few weeks ago, would I have leapt to her defense, knowing the assailant is more likely to have a gun now than ever.  The answer was yes I would do something for sure.  

Those who have continued to justify these words as "just talk" seem unwilling to even consider the power words have, particularly when coming from leadership.  That blind spot, has me wondering, if someone came armed and attacked me for being Jewish, who would step in?  Would there be a voice stepping up to help me and my family?

Ask yourself the same question. What do you stand for now?  If you support a particular candidate or party. what do they stand for that you believe in?  Do you actually believe in something, such that if your candidate turned his or her back on it, you would vote that candidate out?  Would you speak out against the candidate you once voted for?  Why wouldn't you?

There was a story on NPR this morning about Asians now feeling the need to arm themselves due to the increased chance of a violent encounter.  Are you going to speak up against that?  I certainly have and will continue to do so.

Today is Yom HaShoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day. It is a day that reminds Jews particularly that those that remain silent in the face of great horror are complicit.  There is no other way to look at it.  And after seeing the complicity that took place over the last four years in this country, which led to January 6th of this year, one has to wonder how this scene would play out now?

My greatest fear in watching this scene and surveying the America I now see is that perhaps both the prisoner and civilian trigger the explosions. That our divisiveness and need for self gratification and self importance have overtaken our morals, and that given a choice, we would downgrade the value of other's lives as meaning very little when compared to our own.  

I hope I am wrong.


Thursday, February 4, 2021

THIS LAND IS MY LAND - Brought to you by the extreme right of the Republican Party

The extreme and even slight right of the GOP has brought to you this new theme song to be played at all future rallies.

 THIS LAND IS MY LAND - (adapted from Woody Guthrie - if he were a TRUE AMERICAN)

This Land is MY land

Oh Yes it’s MY land

You are not wanted here.

You never were, dear.

So please take your leave

B'fore my gun gives you a reprieve.

This land was made for ONLY ME.

 
Though I came over, with the others before me,

And stole the east coast, called it my country.

Took the rest by slaughters, not that I’ll tell my daughters;

This land was made for ONLY ME.

 
This Land is My Land

This land ain’t your land

I’m fencing us in,

to protect us from Muslims.

From Mexican druggees, and their rapist thuggees

This land was made for only ME.


When I look back now

At my pictured hist’ry,

I don’t see Blacks now.

I don’t see Chinese.

There were no Jews here.

Let’s make this real clear.

This land was made for only me.


This land is MY land

It’s always MY land

We don’t want gaybos,

or transgender homos.

We stand up straight now.

We can be great now!

Because this land was made for only me.

 

THIS LAND, WAS MADE FOR ONLY ME.